Saw Type for Jaw Surgery

This trial aims to determine if a specific type of saw used during jaw surgery affects bone fracture patterns. It compares two saw types: the inferior osteotomy made by a border saw and the inferior osteotomy made with a reciprocating saw, to identify which results in a more favorable fracture pattern. Individuals undergoing jaw (mandible) surgery without severe facial deformities from genetic conditions may qualify for this study. As an unphased trial, it offers participants the chance to contribute to important research that could enhance surgical outcomes for future patients.

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

Research has shown that using a border saw for jaw surgery is generally safe. One study found that a modified technique with this saw reduced complications by over 93% compared to traditional methods, resulting in fewer issues like jawbone defects.

For the reciprocating saw, studies also report positive outcomes. Specifically, one study found a very low complication rate of just 4.3% in surgeries using similar techniques, suggesting that the reciprocating saw is generally safe for jaw surgery.

Researchers are excited about this trial because it's exploring how different surgical tools might impact jaw surgery outcomes. Typically, jaw surgery involves using a reciprocating saw, but this trial is testing an alternative approach with a border saw. The border saw might offer more precision and potentially reduce recovery time compared to the traditional method. Understanding these differences could lead to improvements in surgical techniques, making the procedure safer and more effective for patients.

This trial will compare two saw types for jaw surgery: the border saw and the reciprocating saw. Research has shown that using a border saw in jaw surgery creates more predictable fracture patterns. This tool guides the fracture line to safer areas, reducing the chance of complications. Patients often experience good cosmetic results and fewer long-term issues along the jawline. Meanwhile, studies have found that a reciprocating saw can make the surgery quicker, improving patient comfort and lowering costs. However, the traditional saw is recommended for more reliable outcomes and precise cuts in jaw surgeries. Both tools offer advantages, and the choice depends on the specific goals and desired results of the surgery. Participants in this trial will receive jaw surgery using one of these saw types.³⁴⁵⁶⁷