AV Graft vs. Surgical Fistula for Kidney Failure

Not currently recruiting at 9 trial locations
MR
BB
BB
Overseen ByBrindusa Burciu
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to compare two surgical options for creating a reliable access point for dialysis in people with severe kidney failure. It will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of each method: one uses a natural blood vessel (fistula), and the other uses a synthetic tube (known as an AV Graft). The trial seeks participants who are on dialysis through a central line, have been recommended for surgery by their kidney doctor, and have conditions like heart disease or diabetes. As an unphased trial, this study offers participants the chance to contribute to important research that may improve future dialysis treatments.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What prior data suggests that these arteriovenous access placements are safe for older adults with end stage kidney disease?

Research has shown that both arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) and surgeries to create a fistula present safety concerns for people with kidney failure. Studies suggest that older patients using AV grafts might face a higher risk of health issues, including lower survival rates and more frequent problems with the graft itself.

Conversely, creating a fistula through surgery is often safer in some respects. Research indicates that fistula surgeries usually result in fewer complications. These procedures tend to cause fewer immediate post-surgery problems and often lead to better long-term outcomes. However, both options involve surgery, which always carries some risk.

In summary, while both treatments are widely used and researched, AV grafts may pose a higher risk of complications compared to fistulas. It is crucial for individuals to consult with a healthcare provider to determine the best option for their specific situation.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about the trial comparing AV grafts and surgical fistulas for kidney failure because it aims to pinpoint which method offers better long-term results for patients needing hemodialysis. Unlike current options, this trial directly compares the durability and effectiveness of AV grafts, known for quicker usability post-surgery, against surgical fistulas, which are often preferred for their longer-lasting functionality. The study could provide crucial insights into optimizing dialysis access, potentially improving patient outcomes and quality of life for those with kidney failure.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for end stage kidney disease?

This trial will compare the effectiveness of two surgical options for permanent hemodialysis access: arteriovenous grafts and surgically placed fistulas. Studies have shown that older patients face a 50-65% higher risk of initial failure with arteriovenous fistulas and an 80% higher risk of complications later compared to grafts. These findings come from a meta-analysis, which combines results from several studies. Conversely, research indicates that fistulas become fully functional 67% of the time at 6 months and 76% of the time at 12 months. Both options—grafts and fistulas—have their pros and cons, and their effectiveness can vary based on individual patient conditions. It is important to consider both options and discuss them with a healthcare provider.16789

Who Is on the Research Team?

MM

Mariana Murea, MD

Principal Investigator

Wake Forest Health Sciences

MP

Matthew P Goldman, MD

Principal Investigator

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

MA

Michael Allon, MD

Principal Investigator

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for older adults aged 60 or above with end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis, specifically those using a central venous catheter and having cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, or diabetes. Candidates must be deemed suitable for AV access surgery by their surgeon and referred by a nephrologist. Exclusions include severe cardiac conditions, anticipated kidney transplant within the year, or plans to switch to peritoneal dialysis.

Inclusion Criteria

You currently rely only on a central venous catheter for hemodialysis.
I am 60 years old or older.
I am on long-term hemodialysis for kidney failure.
See 6 more

Exclusion Criteria

I expect to start peritoneal dialysis within the next year.
I am scheduled for a procedure to create a connection between an artery and vein using methods other than stitches or clips.
I have severe heart issues, including very low heart pump function, a heart transplant, or a device to help my heart pump.
See 5 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo surgical placement of either a fistula or graft for permanent hemodialysis access

Up to 4 years
Regular visits for dialysis and monitoring

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety, effectiveness, and satisfaction with vascular access

4 years
Visits at baseline, Months 1, 6, 12, and annually

Outcome Assessment

Assessment of catheter-free dialysis days, infections, and patient-reported outcomes

Up to 4 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • AV Graft
  • Surgical Intervention for Creation of a Fistula
Trial Overview The study compares two surgical methods for creating arteriovenous access in patients: an AV graft versus a fistula. It aims to determine which is more effective and safer for older adults with multiple chronic conditions who are undergoing long-term hemodialysis treatment.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: fistula surgically placedExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: graft surgically placedActive Control1 Intervention

AV Graft is already approved in United States, European Union for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Arteriovenous Graft for:
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as AV Graft for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,432
Recruited
2,506,000+

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Collaborator

Trials
1,841
Recruited
28,150,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

The AV Access Study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving 262 older adults (≥60 years) with chronic hemodialysis to compare the clinical outcomes of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) versus arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) over an average follow-up of 2 years.
The primary outcome will measure the rate of central venous catheter (CVC)-free days, while the primary safety outcome will assess severe infections related to vascular access, aiming to provide robust evidence for optimizing vascular access care in this patient population.
Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial of fistula vs. graft arteriovenous vascular access in older adults with end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis: the AV access trial.Murea, M., Gardezi, AI., Goldman, MP., et al.[2023]
In a study of 136 surgical salvage procedures for arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), the cumulative patency rates were high at 91% at 3 months, 83% at 6 months, and 77% at 12 months, indicating effective long-term outcomes.
The most common salvage procedures included re-anastomosis (37.2%) and AVF declotting (34.1%), highlighting the effectiveness of these techniques in managing complicated AVFs.
[Salvage of vascular access: a case study from the Columbus nephrology division, Rome, Italy].Ferraro, PM., Lombardi, G., D'Ascenzo, F., et al.[2013]
In a pilot study involving 36 older adults with end-stage kidney disease, both arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) showed a primary access failure rate of 31%, indicating similar initial outcomes for both types of vascular access.
Successful cannulation rates were slightly higher for AVG (62%) compared to AVF (50%), but the differences were not substantial enough to favor one method over the other, suggesting that further research with larger sample sizes is needed to determine the best option for this population.
Arteriovenous Fistula Versus Graft Access Strategy in Older Adults Receiving Hemodialysis: A Pilot Randomized Trial.Robinson, T., Geary, RL., Davis, RP., et al.[2022]

Citations

A randomized pilot study to evaluate graft versus fistula ...A meta-analysis of 13 studies concluded that older patients have 50-65% higher odds of primary AV fistula failure and 80% higher odds of secondary AV fistula ...
Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the InnAVasc ...Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the InnAVasc Graft for Dialysis Access in Patients With Kidney Failure ... Kidney Failure, ChronicRenal Dialysis.
Comparing the outcomes of femoral vein transposition ...Finding suitable vascular access for dialysis is a significant challenge in advanced kidney failure. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) need ...
Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial of fistula vs ...A meta-analysis of 13 studies concluded that older patients have a 50–65% higher risk of primary AVF failure and 80% higher risk of secondary ...
FULL TEXT... failure. In total, 68.1% of arteriovenous fistula ligations ... vascular access in patients with hemodialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease.
Outcomes of arteriovenous graft vs. fistula for haemodialysis ...These results suggested that in elderly patients undergoing haemodialysis, AVG was associated with reduced overall survival and access survival, and higher ...
Five Year Outcomes in Patients with End Stage Renal ...Graft and fistula failure can force patients to rely on central venous catheters, which are associated with higher rates of infection, all cause mortality, and ...
Vascular Access - Annual Data Report | USRDS - NIHIn this chapter, we describe vascular access use and outcomes among patients receiving HD. We first examine access use in incident patients initiating HD. We ...
Management of dialysis access in the post-transplantation ...Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) has historically been regarded as the gold standard for hemodialysis (HD) access in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security