6250 Participants Needed

Adaptive Ventilation Strategies + Corticosteroids for Critical Respiratory Insufficiency

(PRACTICAL Trial)

Recruiting at 79 trial locations
SA
JW
CC
R(
Overseen ByRongyu ( Cindy) Jin
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to test new treatments for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), a serious condition where the lungs can't supply enough oxygen to the blood. Researchers are exploring various breathing support methods, such as conventional lung-protective ventilation and ultra-protective ventilation with extracorporeal support, as well as medications like corticosteroids, to determine their effectiveness in improving patient outcomes. Multiple treatment groups will assess how well each approach addresses different aspects of lung failure. Individuals with recent or worsening breathing problems who require significant oxygen support might be suitable candidates for this trial. As an unphased trial, this study offers a unique opportunity to contribute to groundbreaking research that could shape future treatments for AHRF.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial protocol does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. However, if you are currently using corticosteroids, you may not be eligible for certain parts of the trial.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research shows that standard lung-protective ventilation is usually well-tolerated by patients with acute breathing problems. Studies indicate it reduces lung damage during mechanical ventilation. However, adherence to this method can vary, potentially affecting its effectiveness.

For ultra-protective ventilation, which uses a machine to help remove carbon dioxide, research highlights its use mainly in severe cases. This approach allows the lungs to rest. Some studies suggest it benefits very sick patients, but risks such as bleeding or infection exist due to its invasive nature.

Both treatments aim to protect the lungs, but each presents its own challenges and risks. Discuss potential side effects and benefits with healthcare providers when considering joining a trial.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about these ventilation strategies for critical respiratory insufficiency because they explore innovative ways to support patients. Ultra-protective ventilation, coupled with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, seeks to minimize lung damage by reducing driving pressure and respiratory rate, which is a novel approach compared to traditional lung-protective strategies. Another intriguing method is the VV ECMO-facilitated strategy, which aims to promote earlier awakening, extubation, and rehabilitation, potentially speeding up recovery. Additionally, the CORT-E2 trial examines the timing and duration of corticosteroid use, which could refine how inflammation is managed in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. These strategies could transform care by reducing lung injury and improving recovery times.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure?

This trial will compare different adaptive ventilation strategies and corticosteroid treatments for critical respiratory insufficiency. One arm will use ultra-protective ventilation facilitated by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R). Research has shown that ECCO2R might help patients with severe breathing problems by allowing doctors to use gentler ventilator settings, which can prevent further lung damage and manage respiratory acidosis. Previous research suggested that this method is safe and could lead to better recovery for patients with serious lung issues.

Another arm will investigate the use of corticosteroids. Studies have shown that starting corticosteroids early and using them for a longer period can reduce lung inflammation, potentially helping patients breathe easier and recover more quickly. However, the best timing and duration for this treatment remain under investigation.678910

Who Is on the Research Team?

LM

Laveena Munshi, MD

Principal Investigator

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada

DR

Dmitry Rozenberg, MD, PhD

Principal Investigator

University Health Network, Toronto

AN

Anastasia Newman, PhD

Principal Investigator

McMaster University

EG

Ewan Goligher, MD, PhD

Principal Investigator

University Health Network, Toronto

NF

Niall Ferguson, MD, MSc

Principal Investigator

University Health Network, Toronto

EF

Eddy Fan, MD, PhD

Principal Investigator

University Health Network, Toronto

LD

Lorenzo Del Sorbo, MD

Principal Investigator

University Health Network, Toronto

BR

Bram Rochwerg, MD, MSc

Principal Investigator

McMaster University

BT

Bijan Teja, MD

Principal Investigator

Unity Health Toronto

JM

John Muscedere, MD

Principal Investigator

Queens University

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

Adults over 18 with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) needing high-flow nasal cannula, non-invasive or invasive ventilation can join. They must have had corticosteroids for AHRF for at least 10 days and not be suffering from conditions like heart failure or pulmonary embolism. Exclusions include allergy to dexamethasone, severe brain injury, certain contraindications to anticoagulation, previous neuromuscular disorders, suspected COVID-19 infection among others.

Inclusion Criteria

I have been treated with corticosteroids for acute respiratory failure for 10 days.
You have new lung problems in one or both lungs.
I am currently on high-flow oxygen or ventilation support.
See 7 more

Exclusion Criteria

I have had severe low oxygen levels for more than 6 hours.
I am over 65 years old.
My weight is more than 1kg for every cm of my height.
See 32 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive various interventions for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, including mechanical ventilation strategies and pharmacological agents

28 days
Daily monitoring for intervention duration

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, including ventilator-free days and survival status

4 weeks
Weekly assessments

Open-label extension (optional)

Participants may continue to receive study interventions as part of ongoing evaluation

Long-term

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Conventional lung-protective ventilation
  • Ultra-protective ventilation facilitated by extracorporeal support
Trial Overview The trial is testing various interventions: usual care without extended corticosteroids; different mechanical ventilation strategies such as ultra-protective ventilation facilitated by ECMO and driving pressure-limited ventilation; early versus extended doses of corticosteroids in patients with persistent AHRF.
How Is the Trial Designed?
9Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: VV ECMO-facilitated strategy of earlier awakening, extubation and rehabilitationExperimental Treatment3 Interventions
Group II: Ultra-protective ventilation facilitated by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal.Experimental Treatment3 Interventions
Group III: The Nebulized Furosemide for the Treatment of Pulmonary Inflammation (FAST-3) domainExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Group IV: The Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Strategies in Venovenous-Extracorporeal Life Support (IMV-ECLS)Experimental Treatment3 Interventions
Group V: The Fludrocortisone in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure with Airspace Disease (FLUDRO-1) domainExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Group VI: The Corticosteroid Early and Extended (CORT-E2) Randomized Controlled Trial domainExperimental Treatment4 Interventions
Group VII: Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV) Strategies domainExperimental Treatment4 Interventions
Group VIII: Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients Receiving Ongoing Mechanical Ventilation (IMPROV) DomainExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Group IX: Evaluating Subphenotypes in Immunocompromized Patients with ARF (ESCAPE) DomainExperimental Treatment1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Ewan Goligher

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1
Recruited
6,300+

University Health Network, Toronto

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,555
Recruited
526,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a study involving 39 patients with severe ARDS on vv-ECMO, ultra-lung-protective ventilation did not lead to a reduction in inflammatory biomarkers compared to standard lung-protective ventilation, despite using significantly lower mechanical power.
There was a concerning trend towards higher 60-day mortality in the ultra-lung-protective group (45%) compared to the control group (17%), suggesting that this ventilation strategy may not be beneficial and requires further investigation.
Ultra-lung-protective ventilation and biotrauma in severe ARDS patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a randomized controlled study.Guervilly, C., Fournier, T., Chommeloux, J., et al.[2022]
Lung-protective mechanical ventilation is a safe and potentially beneficial strategy for patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), based on observational data and systematic reviews.
This ventilation approach includes specific principles such as using lower tidal volumes (4 to 8 ml/kg), maintaining plateau pressures below 30 cmH2O, and ensuring adequate oxygen levels, making it suitable for both perioperative and critical care settings.
Initial ventilator settings for critically ill patients.Kilickaya, O., Gajic, O.[2021]
In a study of 11 severely burned patients with respiratory dysfunction, a lung-protective ventilation strategy significantly improved oxygenation, as indicated by an increase in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio from 193.54 to 327.14 after treatment.
Despite the improvement in respiratory function, the overall mortality rate was high, with 5 out of 11 patients dying, primarily due to renal failure and multiple organ dysfunction, highlighting the severity of their conditions.
[Analysis of the efficacy of lung-protective ventilation strategy in burn patients with respiratory dysfunction].Cao, L., Liu, G., Deng, S.[2006]

Citations

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for the treatment of ...To determine whether using extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal improves outcomes in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure and is cost-effective.
Feasibility and safety of ultra-low volume ventilation (≤ 3 ml ...Ultra-protective ventilation is the combination of low airway pressures and tidal volume (Vt) combined with extra corporeal carbon dioxide ...
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineFeasibility and safety of extracorporeal CO2 removal to enhance protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: the SUPERNOVA ...
Expert perspectives on ECCO2R for acute hypoxemic ...ECCO 2 R may facilitate UPLV with lower volume and pressures provided by the ventilator, while controlling respiratory acidosis.
Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for patients with ...Pooled results showed that the treatment of ECCO2R was associated with a longer length of hospital stay in patients with ARF secondary to ARDS or acute hypoxic ...
Prevalence and Outcome of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory ...ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome, AHRF = acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, MV = mechanical ventilation. TABLE 1. Baseline ...
Delivery of Lung-protective Ventilation for Acute Respiratory ...Lung-protective ventilation (LPV) improves outcomes for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but adherence remains inadequate.
Lung-protective Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress ...Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a type of acute, diffuse, and inflammatory lung injury. The Berlin definition (2012)1 includes the following ARDS ...
The Association Between Mechanical Power Within the First ...Recent evidence suggests that these benefits may extend beyond ARDS to the broader category of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF).
Guide to Lung-Protective Ventilation in Cardiac PatientsIn acute respiratory failure, PPV may contribute to worsening lung injury. LPV can mitigate some of these effects and improve both cardiac and pulmonary ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security