410 Participants Needed

Lithotripsy vs Cutting Balloon for Coronary Artery Disease

(Short-Cut Trial)

Recruiting at 21 trial locations
SB
AK
Overseen ByAjay Kirtane, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Baim Institute for Clinical Research
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to compare two treatments—cutting balloon angioplasty and intravascular lithotripsy, which uses sound waves to break up calcium deposits—to determine which is more effective before placing a drug-eluting stent in individuals with moderate to severely calcified coronary arteries. Calcium buildup narrows and hardens these arteries, affecting blood flow to the heart. Suitable candidates for this trial have been diagnosed with coronary artery disease and require a procedure to open a blocked heart artery, especially if they experience symptoms like chest pain or have had a positive stress test for heart issues.

As an unphased trial, this study provides an opportunity to contribute to valuable research that could enhance treatment options for coronary artery disease.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research has shown that both cutting balloon angioplasty and intravascular lithotripsy are generally well-tolerated treatments for hardened coronary arteries.

For the cutting balloon, studies have found a high success rate in performing the procedure. Patients report good results without major side effects, indicating that the treatment is relatively safe with no significant complications.

Regarding intravascular lithotripsy, studies report a success rate of 98.8% for the procedure. Serious complications like vessel perforation and major tears are rare, occurring in less than 1% of cases. Overall, negative events are uncommon, making it a generally safe option.

Both treatments have demonstrated promising safety records in past studies, with low rates of serious complications.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Most treatments for coronary artery disease, like traditional balloon angioplasty and stenting, focus on physically widening the artery. But intravascular lithotripsy is different because it uses sound waves to break up calcium deposits in the arteries, making it easier to open them up. This technique can be especially helpful for patients with heavily calcified arteries, where standard methods might struggle. Meanwhile, the cutting balloon combines dilation with tiny blades that score the artery plaque, potentially leading to more precise plaque modification. Researchers are excited about these methods as they offer new ways to tackle complex arterial blockages, which are difficult to treat with existing options.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for coronary artery disease?

This trial will compare the effectiveness of cutting balloon angioplasty and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for treating coronary artery disease. Research has shown that cutting balloon angioplasty effectively treats coronary artery disease, reducing the risk of needing repeat procedures compared to regular balloons, though it may not decrease the chance of the artery narrowing again after treatment. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), another treatment option in this trial, uses sound waves to break up hard calcium in the arteries. Studies have demonstrated that IVL is safe and aids in successfully placing stents in arteries with significant calcium buildup. It also boasts a high success rate with few complications, making it a reliable choice for patients with complex artery conditions.12678

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults over 21 with moderate to severely calcified coronary arteries, who have a stenosis of more than 50% but less than 70%, and show signs of ischemia. They must need PCI treatment for conditions like stable coronary artery disease, unstable angina, or NSTEMI with decreasing biomarkers.

Inclusion Criteria

You are at least 21 years old, have a cardiac condition for which percutaneous coronary intervention is recommended (stable coronary artery disease, unstable angina or NSTEMI with decreasing biomarkers) and you give your informed consent to participate in the study.
You have either more than 270 degrees of superficial calcium on intravascular imaging with a length greater than 5mm, or complete circumferential coverage by 360 degrees.
I have a partially blocked artery confirmed by a test showing reduced blood flow.
See 5 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo either cutting balloon angioplasty or intravascular lithotripsy, with or without rotational atherectomy, followed by drug-eluting stent implantation

Index procedure
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness, including assessment of post-procedural stent area and MACCE at 30 days

30 days

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Cutting Balloon
  • Intravascular Lithotripsy
Trial Overview The Short-Cut trial compares two treatments on patients before they get drug-eluting stents: cutting balloon angioplasty and intravascular lithotripsy. It's a randomized controlled study to see which method works better at treating calcified coronary arteries.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Cutting BalloonActive Control1 Intervention
Group II: Intravascular LithotripsyActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Baim Institute for Clinical Research

Lead Sponsor

Trials
29
Recruited
55,700+

Kathleen Kearney, MD

Collaborator

Trials
1
Recruited
410+

Robert W. Yeh, MD

Collaborator

Trials
1
Recruited
410+

Akiko Maehara, MD

Collaborator

Trials
2
Recruited
460+

Ajay Kirtane, MD

Collaborator

Trials
1
Recruited
410+

C. Michael Gibson, MS, MD

Collaborator

Trials
1
Recruited
410+

Suzanne Baron, MD

Collaborator

Trials
1
Recruited
410+

Citations

An analysis of published cases of cutting balloon use in ...Cutting balloon angioplasty appears to be a technically feasible and safe adjunctive therapy, offering favorable angiographic outcomes and ...
Cutting balloon versus standard balloon for lesion ...A prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a cutting balloon compared to standard balloons.
Enhanced Efficiency of Sequential Cutting Balloon ...This study introduces the RODIN‐CUT technique, a novel approach utilizing sequential CB inflations with real‐time intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance.
Use of cutting or scoring balloons in patients with native ...The use of cutting/scoring balloons was associated with a lower risk of TLR than that of conventional balloons (OR, 0.67; 95%CI, 0.53-0.85; I-squared, 0%) ( ...
Cutting Balloon Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty ...The controlled dilatation of the cutting balloon did not reduce the rate of angiographic restenosis compared with conventional PTCA (CB 31.4%, compared with ...
Evaluating IVL Against Cutting Balloons and Super-High- ...Results showed the mean post-procedural minimum stent area was 8.6 mm for IVL and 8.0 mm for the cutting balloon group. "There were no ...
Assessment of Cutting-Balloon Angioplasty with Novel ... - TrialsA previous study investigating the efficacy of cutting balloons reported a mean CSA of 6.26 mm2 after cutting balloon treatment for native ...
The Effectiveness and Safety of the Coronary Artery ...To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the coronary serrated cutting balloon dilation catheter for the pre-dilation of coronary artery stenosis lesions.
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security